• Home
  • Archive
  • Disclosure
    • Disclaimer
    • Comment Policy
    • Privacy Policy
  • Just Three
  • Contact
    • Who Am I ?
    • What does Ethereal Mind mean ?

EtherealMind

Software Defined & Intent Based Networking

You are here: Home / Blog / On the Difference Twinax and Cat6 UTP 10 Gigabit Ethernet

On the Difference Twinax and Cat6 UTP 10 Gigabit Ethernet

6th July 2010 By Greg Ferro Filed Under: Blog, Design

There are two copper cabling types defined for 10Gigabit Ethernet, one using the usual UTP cabling that must be at least Cat6 or higher standard. This table show the key differences.

Connector (Media) Cable Distance Protocol
SFP+ CU copper Twinax 10m 10GBase-CX1
RJ45 10GbaseT Copper Cat6, Cat6A, Cat7 100m 10GBaseT

Why Twinax

The twinax cable uses a different signal propagation method, my understanding is that it’s more like a radio wave than an electrical signal. A UTP signal needs a lot of electronics to drive generate and receive the signal.

The end result is that Twinax uses much less power (something around 1 – 1.5W per port) compared to UTP (4 – 6 W per port). When you have a lot of ports this power consumption can be significant factor in design.

You can see this in Cisco UCS designs where it is recommended to use the Twinax cables from the server to the Nexus 5000 switch as a server to Top of Rack cabling solution (not entirely unlike Infiniband). Of course, your connections from the Nexus 5K to the network core are likely to fibre or UTP since the maximum distance of the twinax solution is only 10 metres.

The EtherealMind View

Twinax is an ideal 10GbE solution for server to Top of Rack switch connection. Since it uses less power and is more reliable that UTP solution as the cable is physically more robust and not subject to physical damage, an important consideration for 10GbE over copper. Any damage to the copper cable due to crushing or bending can cause intermittent failures on Cat6 cabling (although less likely on Cat6A).

But the main reason for choosing twinax for 10GbE is lower power consumption for server to top of rack connections for integrated storage and data networks.

About Greg Ferro

Human Infrastructure for Data Networks. 25 year survivor of Corporate IT in many verticals, tens of employers working on a wide range of networking solutions and products.

Host of the Packet Pushers Podcast on data networking at http://packetpushers.net- now the largest networking podcast on the Internet.

My personal blog at http://gregferro.com

Comments

  1. Michael McNamara says

    6th July 2010 at 15:46 +0000

    We recently deployed a large number of Cisco Nexus 2148s (top of rack) with Nexus 5010s and used all 10GBaseCX1 interfaces. The primary reason to use the 10GBaseCX1 interfaces over 10GBaseSR was cost. We ended up saving a lot of money by using the integrated SFP+ and twinax cable as opposed to purchasing the individual optical transceivers (10GBaseSR SFP+) and then the fiber optic patches.

    You do need to be aware of the current distance limitations. Cisco only supports cables up to 5m in length even though the spec allows for 10m.

    Cheers!

    • Greg Ferro says

      6th July 2010 at 15:50 +0000

      Michael

      Thanks for the tip.

      So how do you find those NX2K fabric Extenders ? I can’t quite believe that they really work, and chatting with some people, no one really trusts them or the idea behind them.

      • Michael McNamara says

        6th July 2010 at 17:27 +0000

        We used them for a new data center build where we had to provide connectivity to 10 racks of big box servers. We did have a Nexus 5010 up an die on us within days but so far everything else has been working fine. At the time the 2148 was the only option available and so we had to also deploy some 2960Gs for the 10/100Mbps devices (iLOs, PDU/UPS, etc). Now of course the 2248 is available which provides 100/1000Mbps connectivity.

        Cheers!

  2. Jason Gurtz says

    8th July 2010 at 17:00 +0000

    But see http://ow.ly/28KlI which discusses distance limitations of Cat 6 used for 10GBase-T

    • Greg Ferro says

      8th July 2010 at 18:24 +0000

      Yes, only 55 metres on Cat6 (from memory). Basically, you would not choose to run 10GBaseT for anything, you should use fibre for all 10GbE and above.

      There is no, and never will be, copper support for 40GbE and 100GbE

      • Ian Davidson says

        14th July 2010 at 23:09 +0000

        To say there will never be support for 40GbE on copper is flat-earth thinking. The same was said of 10GbE on UTP and it is now the lowest cost and most flexible solution for 10 Gig. 40Gig standards for UTP are already under discussion.

  3. anon says

    1st August 2010 at 17:47 +0000

    “The twinax cable uses a different signal propagation method, my understanding is that itís more like a radio wave than an electrical signal”

    In EM field theory every “electrical” signal carried by wires or other medium is an electromagnetic wave. The signal in a twinax or RJ45 cable is not different from this point of view.
    It changes how it is carried, including dispersion, interference and so on.

Network Break Podcast

Network Break is round table podcast on news, views and industry events. Join Ethan, Drew and myself as we talk about what happened this week in networking. In the time it takes to have a coffee.

Packet Pushers Weekly

A podcast on Data Networking where we talk nerdy about technology, recent events, conduct interviews and more. We look at technology, the industry and our daily work lives every week.

Our motto: Too Much Networking Would Never Be Enough!

Find Me on Social Media

  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Return to top of page

Copyright Greg Ferro 2008-2019 - Thanks for reading my site, it's been good to have you here.

Opinions, Views and Ideas expressed here are my own and do not represent any employer, vendor or sponsor.Full disclosure