<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Use Two Routing Processes in a Firewall ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etherealmind.com/why-use-two-routing-processes-in-a-firewall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etherealmind.com/why-use-two-routing-processes-in-a-firewall/</link>
	<description>Network design, architecture, thinking, working. Tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/why-use-two-routing-processes-in-a-firewall/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/2008/03/10/why-use-two-routing-processes-in-a-firewall/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Greg -

Makes much sense now! Thanks for taking the time out to write a detailed post about this! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg -</p>
<p>Makes much sense now! Thanks for taking the time out to write a detailed post about this! <img src='http://etherealmind.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: etherealmind.com @ 2012-02-11 11:53:20 by W3 Total Cache -->
