<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My EtherealMind&#187; fcoe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etherealmind.com/tag/fcoe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etherealmind.com</link>
	<description>Network design, architecture, thinking, working. Tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:40:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sponsored: Brocade Virtual Symposium &#8211; Storage Convergence</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/brocade-virtual-symposium-storage-convergence/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/brocade-virtual-symposium-storage-convergence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brocade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[converged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=6617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing the series from the Brocade Virtual Symposium. In a special video session that was sponsored by Brocade, we got Chip Copper  in the room with Stephen Foskett to talk about storage convergence. 

Over the last few years, I've been very critical of Ethernet storage protocols like [FCoE](http://etherealmind.com/tag/fcoe/) and the fact that storage protocols are unlikely to work well. There are few times here where Chip was able to give me answers and a different viewpoint that gave me a different take on the solutions.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/brocade-virtual-symposium-storage-convergence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presenting Silvano Gai With FCoTR Button</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/silvano-gai-fcoe-fcotr-button/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/silvano-gai-fcoe-fcotr-button/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcotr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=4794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With great pleasure I present an image of the event whereupon I did present a FibreChannel over Token Ring badge to Silvano Gai. As you can see, he is clearly pleased with such a wondrous gift. On behalf of the FibreChannel over Token Ring community, I say with great pride, mission accomplished. Posts Related to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/silvano-gai-fcoe-fcotr-button/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Does HSRP Have the &#8220;Standby-Bia&#8221; Command ?</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/hsrp-token-ring-why-standby-bia/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/hsrp-token-ring-why-standby-bia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcotr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=3890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does HSRP have a "standby-bia" command option ? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/hsrp-token-ring-why-standby-bia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCoE and Standards: This Is What Really Matters</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-and-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-and-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=3799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the recent weeks, J. Michael Metz from Cisco entered a ****ing contest with my friend Greg and decided to prove that the FCoE standards are done. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-and-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the Real FCoE Standards Stand Up ? No, They Can&#8217;t.</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/real-fcoe-standards-cant-stand-up/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/real-fcoe-standards-cant-stand-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=3635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Michel Metz attempted a sleight of hand magic trick to astroturf over the lack of progress on the Ethernet standards. Unpleasant.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/real-fcoe-standards-cant-stand-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco UCS Servers &#8211; A Little Bit of Cynical Marketing Magic Can Go a Long Way</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-ucs-marketing-magic-long-way/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-ucs-marketing-magic-long-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 19:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blessay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ucs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=3399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can take the view that Cisco Unified Computing System is a product that is carefully designed so that selling it is as easy as possible. A cynical marketing analysis has produced a product that customers can be convinced to buy. Or is it an innovation in server and data centre design that is desperately needed ?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-ucs-marketing-magic-long-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internets of Interest:18 Jan 10</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-18-jan-10/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-18-jan-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bookmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bookmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=2571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Collection of useful, relevant or inane places on the the Internets for 18 Jan 10:</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-18-jan-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internets of Interest:16 Jan 10</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-16-jan-10/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-16-jan-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bookmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bookmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=2551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Collection of useful, relevant or inane places on the the Internets for 16 Jan 10:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-16-jan-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blessay: FCoE Is JUST a Transition Technology</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/blessay-fcoe-transition-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/blessay-fcoe-transition-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blessay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=2410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Evans believes that "FCoE" will rule the world. Hah. I believe it's just a transition technology that drags Storage out of it's closed, proprietary mindset into the open collaborative world. Data Networks can easily adapt. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/blessay-fcoe-transition-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCoE Isn&#8217;t a Replacement for Infiniband, It&#8217;s a Cheaper Copy That Customers Will Buy</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-doesnt-replace-infiniband-copy-cheaper/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-doesnt-replace-infiniband-copy-cheaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blessay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-doesnt-replace-infiniband-copy-cheaper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is some misconception by many in the storage industry that FCoE is some type of replacement for Infiniband. My view is that FCoE is cheaper, dumber but MARKETABLE alternative. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-doesnt-replace-infiniband-copy-cheaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Does This Remind Me of Putting FCoE in My Network ?</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/why-does-this-remind-me-fcoe-my-network/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/why-does-this-remind-me-fcoe-my-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This photo reminds me of networks that I have worked on. FCoE anyone ? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/why-does-this-remind-me-fcoe-my-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Storage: Emulex  Silicon Will Have iSCSI, TOE, FCoE, RDMA &amp; iWarp in a Single Chip</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/emulex-all-in-one-silicon/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/emulex-all-in-one-silicon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buried in this article from the Register is aparagraph detailing Emulex Gen2 chip that does all storage virtualisation in a single chip. The FC boosters will be unhappy, they will have to compete. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/emulex-all-in-one-silicon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reasons for Using NFS With VMware Virtual Infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/vm-etc-nfs-use-nfs/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/vm-etc-nfs-use-nfs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A lot of companies are using NFS as the preferred protocol to shared storage for VMware Virtual Infrastructure. In my personal experience, The administrative options and convenience of NFS is unmatched, and the virtual machine (VM) performance is surprising."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/vm-etc-nfs-use-nfs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case Against FCoE and Fibrechannel &#8211; A Reasonably Complete View</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/the-case-against-fcoe-fibrechannel/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/the-case-against-fcoe-fibrechannel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blessay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of storage bloggers have been questioning the relevance of FCoE and why would you bother with it. Given the size of marketing budgets pushing FCoE and the reality distortion this generates, lets look at the case AGAINST FCoE. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/the-case-against-fcoe-fibrechannel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blessay:Cisco UCS Really Is Just Blade Servers With Fancy NICs &amp; A Response to HP Network Ambition</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-ucs-really-blade-server-fancy-nic/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-ucs-really-blade-server-fancy-nic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blessay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ucs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found some information today, realised that UCS is really servers with fancy NICs. It also reinforced my belief that Cisco is responding to HP &#038; IBM, not attacking them. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-ucs-really-blade-server-fancy-nic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCoE and the Return of Spanning Tree</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-forces-return-spanning-tree/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-forces-return-spanning-tree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most amusing parts about Fibre Channel over Ethernet(FCoE) is that Spanning Tree is making a triumphant comeback. And I am talking a Roman style parade after the gates to the city have been built and the streets lined with gold. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-forces-return-spanning-tree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Is Wishfully Wishing for FCoE Sales ?</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-wishing-for-fcoe-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-wishing-for-fcoe-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Omar Sultan from Cisco is wishing that FCoE would actually get some sales ?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-wishing-for-fcoe-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foundry Postpones Vote on Brocade Deal, Stock Plunges 
 &#8211; Network World</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/foundry-brocade-fcoe-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/foundry-brocade-fcoe-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The path to FCoE is not running smoothly is it? Without Brocade to validate FCoE by bringing it into their portfolio, Cisco will ahve a tough time make FCoE look viable. Recent articles from SNW weren&#8217;t completely positive about FCoE and I notice that the CEE standards from the IEEE seem to be running much [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/foundry-brocade-fcoe-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Ready to Purchase a Brocade Ethernet Switch ?  What ?</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/brocade-fcoe-entering-the-ethernet-switch/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/brocade-fcoe-entering-the-ethernet-switch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the more amusing byproducts of the FCoE marketing push, is that Brocade has announced that they will producing FCoE switches for their customers. So, are you ready to buy a Brocade Ethernet switch ? In their report to investors, Brocade announced that &#8220;FCoE is Fibre Channel, not legacy Ethernet&#8221;(1). Aside from the breathtaking [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/brocade-fcoe-entering-the-ethernet-switch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Centre Ethernet Standards Fight Brewing ? Brocade Says FCoE in 2010.</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/data-centre-ethernet-standards-fight-ahead-fcoe-failing-future/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/data-centre-ethernet-standards-fight-ahead-fcoe-failing-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I note this quote from a recent article on <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/27/brocade_tech_day_vision_2008/page3.html">The Register</a> where Brocade talks about their future strategy.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/data-centre-ethernet-standards-fight-ahead-fcoe-failing-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Networks &#8211; More Reliable to Than Storage Networks ?</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/data-networks-more-reliable-than-storage-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/data-networks-more-reliable-than-storage-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was participating in a storage design discussion and a Storage person threw up their most common complaint about networking &#8211; &#8220;we don&#8217;t know how to build reliable networks&#8221;. Let me take a shot at that. Investment Between networking and storage, there is a large difference in scale and investment. The Storage markets have been [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/data-networks-more-reliable-than-storage-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More People Against FCoE &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-still-looks-like-junk-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-still-looks-like-junk-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More posts from people who are opposed to FCoE. More meat for the mill&#8230;. Is FCoE a Diabolical Plot?; Musings on SNW&#8217;s Day 2 FCoE Announcements Favourite bit: &#8230;. my guess is that the FC vendors concocted a plan: Use FCoE to connect all enterprise servers, get a few analysts on board to endorse the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/fcoe-still-looks-like-junk-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Anti FCoE, More Like Anti Fibrechannel &#8211; A Response</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/not-anti-fcoe-i-am-anti-fibrechannel/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/not-anti-fcoe-i-am-anti-fibrechannel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got linked from <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/2008/04/the_antifcoe_sentiment.html">Dante Malagrino at the Cisco Data Center</a> blog yesterday. He writes a good post on why FCoE might be a good idea. Let me just say I am not only anti-FCoE, I am anti-Fibrechannel. 

My rebuttal after the jump...
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/not-anti-fcoe-i-am-anti-fibrechannel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Are All the Features for Nexus ? Or Is It Just Me ?</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/where-are-all-the-features-for-nexus-or-is-it-just-me/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/where-are-all-the-features-for-nexus-or-is-it-just-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/2008/03/20/where-are-all-the-features-for-nexus-or-is-it-just-me/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote this in response to Omar Sultan at Cisco on &#8216;Why you want this switch ? I was looking the NX-OS feature navigator today and NX-OS looks (currently) like a substantially feature-free platform &#8211; check out the NX-OS Feature Navigator and consider what is not listed here. A couple of other things that strike [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/where-are-all-the-features-for-nexus-or-is-it-just-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Cisco Nexus 7000 Needed Today &#8211; Or Tomorrow ?</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-nexus-7000-today-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-nexus-7000-today-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No doubt that the Cisco Nexus 7000 switch is a fine piece of technology. The performance and throughput is welcome, and clearly offers some fine new capabilities such as virtualisation, ISSU, better OOB and so on. I am sure that everyone can perceive the positive messages, lets face it, Cisco isn't going to be shy in telling us about them.  </p>

<p>However, lets consider the issue from the perspective of the architect/designer and how Cisco has positioned this in the marketplace. From an architecture perspective, I will need to commit a substantial capex to the product and a much larger amount of resource cost to transition a network to use the product. Even if I am building new data centres (and thus have no legacy), changes to operating standards, procedures, management tools and other orchestration issues present substantial barriers to adoption. </p>

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-nexus-7000-today-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: etherealmind.com @ 2012-05-24 08:09:39 by W3 Total Cache -->
