<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My EtherealMind&#187; ethernet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etherealmind.com/tag/ethernet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etherealmind.com</link>
	<description>Network design, architecture, thinking, working. Tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:53:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Can Fibre Optic Ethernet Cables Be Longer Than the Standard ?</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/can-fibre-optic-ethernet-cables-be-longer-than-the-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/can-fibre-optic-ethernet-cables-be-longer-than-the-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 19:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=5967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short Answer is "It depends, but usually yes." Long answer follows with a discussion of launch power, receiver sensitivity, and cable losses.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/can-fibre-optic-ethernet-cables-be-longer-than-the-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Responding: On Optimizing Traffic for Network Virtualization</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/responding-on-optimizing-traffic-for-network-virtualization/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/responding-on-optimizing-traffic-for-network-virtualization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datacenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lossless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=5955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm responding to Brad Hedlund's post "On optimizing traffic for network virtualization" where he seems to missed a key point. It's about cost of ownership in terms of ability to troubleshoot. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/responding-on-optimizing-traffic-for-network-virtualization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethernet Jumbo Frames, Full Duplex and Why Jumbo Frames Are 9000 Bytes)</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/ethernet-jumbo-frames-full-duplex-9000-bytes/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/ethernet-jumbo-frames-full-duplex-9000-bytes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 16:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=5921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been doing some research into Ethernet and the use of Jumbo frames for some content I've been writing and come across something interesting. The documents state that Jumbo frames can only be used on Full Duplex Ethernet connections.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/ethernet-jumbo-frames-full-duplex-9000-bytes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Are 10 Gigabit Ultra Short Reach (USR) Optics ?</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/what-are-10-gigabit-ultra-short-reach-usr-optics/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/what-are-10-gigabit-ultra-short-reach-usr-optics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=5901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks back I posted this article comparing pricing and features on Cisco Fabric Ethernet Transceivers as a low cost option compared to 10GbaseSR SFP+ optics in when building 10GbE networks - <a href="http://etherealmind.com/cisco-nexus-5000-2000-fet-fabric-extension-transceiver-sfp-10gbasesr-comparison/">Cisco Nexus 5000 / 2000 Pricing Bundles and Fabric Extension Transceivers (FETs) vs 10GbaseSR SFPs.</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/what-are-10-gigabit-ultra-short-reach-usr-optics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is an Ethernet Fabric ?</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/what-is-an-ethernet-fabric/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/what-is-an-ethernet-fabric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dictionary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fabrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=5738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Define "Ethernet Fabric"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/what-is-an-ethernet-fabric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backplane Ethernet &#8211; The GBaseK Standard</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/backplane-ethernet-gbase-kr-kx/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/backplane-ethernet-gbase-kr-kx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=4701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lesser known standard is Backplane Ethernet. I wasn't aware of it until I was researching Notes on Cables and Connectors for 40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet. I spent some time over the weekend scratching an itch to have a look at it and why it exists.These are scrach notes, and observations from a research session and not intended to a canonical investigation. Interesting though because it's is valuable to understand that many network products are functionally all the same - only the software and the people are different. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/backplane-ethernet-gbase-kr-kx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internets of Interest:3 Jan 11</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-3-jan-11/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-3-jan-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bookmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bookmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autoneg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=4481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Collection of useful, relevant or inane places on the the Internets for 3 Jan 11:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-3-jan-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All the Ethernet Cooks</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/ethernet-standards-many-cooks/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/ethernet-standards-many-cooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blessay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=4359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just how many standards bodies actually make standards for Ethernet ? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/ethernet-standards-many-cooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Futures Review on 40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/notes-physical-connectors-40-100-gigabit-ethernet/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/notes-physical-connectors-40-100-gigabit-ethernet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 12:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=4295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some short observations on 40GbE and 100GbE after reviewing various pieces of documentation. I'm especially focusing on the physical interfaces and cabling data here and its impact on our working practices. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/notes-physical-connectors-40-100-gigabit-ethernet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Show 17 &#8211; Big Hot and Heavy Switches &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/show-17-big-hot-heavy-part-2a/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/show-17-big-hot-heavy-part-2a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 23:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=3759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A detailed look at the Big, Hot and Heavy Ethernet Switches with a large crew to talk about their practical experiences on design, selection and performance of Cisco Nexus switches. The result ? We don't think the Nexus switches are very exciting. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/show-17-big-hot-heavy-part-2a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Packet Pushers &#8211; Show 16 &#8211; Big Hot and Heavy Switches &#8211; Part 1</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/ppp-show-16-big-hot-heavy-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://etherealmind.com/ppp-show-16-big-hot-heavy-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=3724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A detailed look at the Big, Hot and Heavy Ethernet Switches with a large crew to talk about their practical experiences on design, selection and performance of Cisco Nexus switches. The result ? We don&#8217;t think the Nexus switches are very exciting, HP Flex10 modules are a problem, and so much more. Due to people [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://etherealmind.com/ppp-show-16-big-hot-heavy-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: etherealmind.com @ 2012-02-10 03:21:33 by W3 Total Cache -->
