Thursday, March 18, 2010

Rant: SecureCRT — Too Expensive — Alternatives Putty, Tera Term ?

October 24, 2008 by Greg Ferro · 30 Comments 

SecureCRT is a com­mon choice for SSH Client for MS Windows. I want to buy SecureCRT but its too expens­ive. Way too expens­ive. Or is it just me ?

Cost

One copy of SecureCRT is USD$99 and that gets you one year of updates. You can upgrade to 3 years of updates for an extra USD$40. Now that is a lot money for an SSH ter­minal cli­ent and I can­not per­ceive the value. For example, I am read­ily able to pur­chase applic­a­tions of this class1 for about USD$25 but for a hun­dred bucks, it is not good value for money.

securecrt-1.jpg

The good things about SecureCRT are :

  • con­sole sup­port for serial devices
  • script­able login pro­ced­ure that is simple enough to work for net­work geeks
  • it really works. Simple, fast and doesn’t crash.
  • com­fort­able — this is the cli­ent that I have used for a num­ber of years when using Windows so I know how it works

Things that I really hate about SecureCRT:

  • they con­tinue to INSIST on using *NIX con­ven­tions for Cut and Paste. Ctrl+INS and Ctrl+Shift+V are THE WORST POSSIBLE key com­bin­a­tions. Why not Ctrl-​​C and Ctrl-​​V ? What about a global option to change the cut /​ paste keystrike
  • Price
  • The global and ses­sion options are stu­pidly laid out and almost unusable.
  • PRICE

Lets face it, this product has not changed sig­ni­fic­antly in five years, surely it can’t own them any money ?

sigh.

Putty and Putty Connection Manager

Many people use Putty, which is good but .… clunky. Putty can be improved by using Putty Connection Managemer from http://​puttycm​.free​.fr/ which provides a use­ful graph­ical inter­face for the basic putty. Its a good product, but requires some Microsoft toxic soft­ware (NET 2.0) which tends to bloat Windows installs and requires admin­is­trator access to install and because it needs to load the Net2.0 lib­rary it is quite slow to start and run. In all other respects, it is brilliant.

puttycm-1.jpg

Tera Term

TeraTerm is an Open Source pro­ject (Sourceforge and is a ven­er­able product. It works well enough but I have never been com­fort­able with it.

teraterm-1.jpg

MRemote and VisionAPP Remote Desktop 2008 (VRD2008)

I found Mremote a while ago, which is more than just a skin for Putty, but also included RDP, ICA and Citrix skins. However, that developer has stopped open source and passed to a com­mer­cial application.

Visionapp Remote Desktop 2008 costs USD$89 for a single user license and will incor­por­ate the mRe­mote fea­tures in Jan 2009. Since it will com­bine ” con­nec­tion pro­to­cols such as ICA, VNC, SSH, Telnet, HTTP, HTTPS” its a much more use­ful tool.

And makes my point about SecureCRT not being good value.

Any oth­ers?

Have i missed any ? If you know of other SSH /​ Telnet cli­ents for Windows, please let me know. I am look­ing for some­thing reas­on­ably cheap, that does what net­work­ing people need (not what sysad­mins might use).

Footnotes

  1. mostly that run on MAC [back]

Please rate this post:

  Why Rate Posts?
1 Star - It\\\'s Crud2 Stars - It\\\'s Tosh3 Stars - Something\\\'s missing4 Stars - Needs works5 Stars - Good Enough6 Stars - Good7 Stars - Excellent8 Stars - Brilliant9 Stars - Astonishing10 Stars - Awesomely Godlike? (1 votes, average: 9.00 out of 10)
Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

30 Responses to “Rant: SecureCRT — Too Expensive — Alternatives Putty, Tera Term ?”
  1. I Agree that SecureCRT is too expens­ive. I use putty. On the MAC I use ter­minal. Anything bet­ter for the MAC? I use zterm for con­sole. I wise there was one that did both. maybe i just dont know about one.

  2. Karsten says:

    @Greg: I bought (and upgraded often) the SecureCRT/​SecureFX-​​Bundle. The reason for that is one of your points: It just works! And that saves me money (and nerves) if I can do my work more effi­ciently. And the price? Come on, it’s less than the hourly rate I (and prob­ably you) charge your cus­tom­ers … ;-)
    @Brandon: I use iTerm on Leopard which has a very nice session-​​management (not as good as SecureCRT but ok).

    BTW: has any­one of you found a way to send the “Shift-​​CTRL-​​6 +x” on iTerm or terminal.app?

  3. Ethan says:

    Sadly, at $90, my favor­ite doesn’t fit into your pri­cing cri­teria of free/cheap…but I swear by ZOC. http://​www​.emtec​.com/​z​o​c​/​index.html

  4. The concept of Putty Connection Manager is great, but the require­ment of admin rights is ter­rible. I’m using Tera Term right now, but it seems a little…dated. I also some­times just fire up Cygwin and use the OpenSSH cli­ent there.

  5. Greg Ferro says:

    I use iTerm on the Mac, although ter­minal is get­ting bet­ter. See my dynamips art­icles of you want to see how to use it.

    The fact that Microsoft doesn’t include an SSH or even a tel­net cli­ent in vista is shock­ing, dis­gust­ing and stu­pid at the same time.

  6. Sean says:

    I’m a full time net­work guy — routers, switches, fire­walls. I’ve been happy with Putty, it does everything I need. The high­light to copy is handy, and I’ve had few prob­lems with it. It even does serial now for con­sol­ing into net­work devices.

    At my pre­vi­ous job I had SecureCRT. The tabs were nice, but I don’t miss them.

    • Greg Ferro says:

      I have found that putty is accept­able if you only work on a single net­work. If you have sev­eral net­works that you might work on (lab, dynamips, cust1, cust2, cust3) this is where putty isn’t so great.

      I also use puttytel a lot in cer­tain net­works to get a nice tel­net CLI while using putty ses­sion name to get to it.

      The tabs are not great, but if you are mix­ing Linux /​ IOS /​ ASA /​ BlueCoat /​ Juniper then SecureCRT has an edge.

      Maybe I am miss­ing a “magic hand wave” for putty, a trick that would make it work for me.

      Why are there so few SSH cli­ents ? Why ? Why ? Why ?

  7. Mike Seth says:

    If your daily job con­sists of log­ging on to many machines, and you need an adequate ter­minal emu­lator, how is $40 expens­ive? That’s your primary work tool, and it doesn’t cost thou­sands. No comprende.

    • Greg Ferro says:

      if it WAS $40 then I would not be com­plain­ing. It’s a hun­dred and forty dol­lars, do you know what sort of soft­ware I can buy foe that money ?

      Look at MacBundle — 49 dol­lars for eight top qual­ity programs

    • Greg Ferro says:

      How is USD$100 cheap ? For a pro­gram that hasn’t changed in five years ?

      Its a cor­por­ate rip off. They get away with it because they can.

  8. SecureCRT is worth it, in my opin­ion. I’ve been using it for years and it really is great, like Karsten men­tioned (and you already know). Some of the oth­ers (PuTTY, etc.) are okay, but switch­ing from SecureCRT back to PuTTY or one of the oth­ers is like switch­ing back to dial-​​up after you’ve had a taste of broadband!

  9. François Luneau says:

    I’ve been using SecureCRT for > 9 years now and what poin­ted me towards that pro­gram was simply the VBA sup­port. Above and bey­ond the “script­able login pro­ced­ure”, SecureCRT can actu­ally have scripts to do any­thing, even a watch­dog script that looks at what you are doing and act accord­ingly if you wish it so.

    At some point I had no SNMP access to > 1500 routers and needed to change the pass­words on these boxes. VBA in SecureCRT allowed me to login to each of those boxes, change the pass­word, test the pass­word change by con­nect­ing back into the same router then sav­ing the con­fig when suc­cess­ful while writ­ing a report in an Excel file, all this from a rather simple VBA script.

    As for the CTRL-​​C being dis­abled by default, there is a good reason behind that, mostly if you are using the soft­ware to con­fig­ure Cisco equip­ment. CTRL-​​C, for example, is a spe­cial code that you need to send to most Cisco devices to do a pass­word recov­ery and if it were inter­cep­ted for an pro­gram inter­face com­mand, it would make it much more com­plic­ated to send to the devices you are con­nec­ted to. They made an assump­tion but I think they were right in doing so for most of their customers.

    Also, you must know that you can change this in the application’s set­tings, by con­nec­tion, though. This way, you can get it to remem­ber to dis­able CTRL-​​C for Cisco and Unix con­nec­tions, where CTRL-​​C is needed to be sent out to the remote host, while con­fig­ur­ing some other con­nec­tions to use CTRL-​​C for copy, CTRL-​​V for paste and so on and so forth.

    As for the global and per con­nec­tion set­tings, I believe you could get over that by tak­ing your time to under­stand it. It is actu­ally rather prac­tical although maybe a little dif­fer­ent than what you’d be used to.

    Another fea­ture which may be over­looked but which I like is the pos­sib­il­ity of hav­ing dif­fer­ent visual set­tings per con­nec­tions. For example, you could set it to have a light green back­ground for any lab con­nec­tions, while you might want to have a light red back­ground for pro­duc­tion machine con­nec­tions. This way, with many open ses­sions, you might pre­vent a dam­age­able com­mand to be issued in the wrong con­text, while mov­ing quickly through the dif­fer­ent sessions.

    But in the end, you pay much more for VBA and the few other read­ily vis­ible fea­tures and, as many seem to sug­gest, it is always a mat­ter of taste more than any­thing. If you are only look­ing for an SSH cli­ent, this may be overkill and over­priced indeed.

    Good luck with that!

    • Greg Ferro says:

      Great reply! Would you be will­ing to share those scripts ? Can we post them here ?

      Personally, I find VBA a dogs break­fast to use and debug. The logic and struc­ture makes no sense to me and thus I have never been temp­ted to use this fea­ture. Maybe a start­ing point for a hack would help — if you can share that would be be kewl.

  10. Mike Bo says:

    I’m work­ing for a cli­ent who sup­plied me with SecureCRT after years of using Putty. About the only advant­age I see to SecureCRT are the ses­sion tabs for con­sol­id­at­ing mul­tiple ses­sions to a single win­dow. Unfortunately, this great fea­ture is off­set by the abso­lutely hor­rible cut/​paste keys. Putty has it right with high­light to copy, click to paste… it’s xterm beha­vior and that’s UNIX. I could even live with Ctrl-​​C/​V… but not some­thing for­eign and unchangeable.

    I’m sorry, I just don’t see the tre­mend­ous fea­tures that oth­ers are singing about — it’s an SSH ter­minal pro­gram… for a hun­dred bucks? The cut/​paste thing has me flee­ing back to Putty imme­di­ately.
    mikebo

    • Maureen Jett says:

      I’m the product man­ager for SecureCRT and I just ran across this thread. I wanted to men­tion that SecureCRT can be con­figured to copy on select and paste on right or middle mouse click. SecureCRT can also be con­figured to use the Windows Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V copy and paste short­cuts. Please feel free to e-​​mail me at Maureen.​Jett@​vandyke.​com if you have any ques­tions about SecureCRT.

      Maureen

  11. Francois says:

    Kitty (an enhanced ver­sion of putty) http://​www​.9bis​.net/kitty/

  12. Johan says:

    @Greg: If you don’t like VBA, use any other lan­guage that integ­rates with win­dows script­ing host, like ActivePerl or ActivePython. They can do the same as VBA when it comes to SecureCRT, most of my older scripts are in perl whereas the newer tend to be python.

    @Mike Bo: Global options, ter­minal. Check “copy on select” and “paste on but­ton” and you will have your X-​​style copy and paste.

    I’ve been a happy SecureCRT user for many years now and I per­son­ally feel it was and is well worth the money.

  13. ck says:

    I, for one see great bene­fit with CRT, cur­rently it is sup­plied by my employer, but i think if i had to pay for it myself and just write it off I would.

    I cur­rently use a mac as my per­sonal laptop and have a win­dows laptop issues by my employer.

    The prob­lem im facing now is, I want to totally aban­don win­dows and wipe the laptop and throw linux on it.

    Secure CRT, and the use of script­ing and its ses­sion man­age­ment are the only thing left to decide how to tackle before i make the move!

    Any sug­ges­tions?

  14. Greg Ferro says:

    I use iTerm for ter­minal work. I talk a bit about it here http://​eth​er​e​al​mind​.com/​2​0​0​8​/​0​1​/​2​2​/​i​t​e​r​m​-​a​n​d​-​d​y​n​a​m​i​p​s​-​w​r​i​t​e​-​t​o​-​a​l​l​-​t​e​r​m​i​n​a​l​s-at-once/

    It has an Applescript inter­face that can script much

    The Terminal in Leopard 10.5.5 also sup­ports a lots of Applescript fea­tures and can be scrip­ted well. I haven’t had the time to put any­thing together. if you have any tips I would love to see them.

  15. Duncan says:

    I’m a full-​​time *nix sup­port engin­eer. I reg­u­larly need to con­nect to mul­tiple hosts using SSH through mul­tiple fire­wall con­nec­tions requir­ing a vari­ety of auth methods.

    I star­ted out with TeraTerm but moved onto PuTTY and spent a while get­ting a com­fort­able con­fig there. However, I do quite a bit of SSH dynamic tun­nel­ling, and found PuTTY a bit clunky for that, and plug­ging the con­fig in and out of the Windows registry took a bit of get­ting used to. I briefly tried both SecureCRT and the SSH​.com products, but didn’t get on with them and had no budget to pay for them anyway.

    I’ve sub­sequently moved to CYGWIN. Being a *nix dude I find this the most nat­ural choice for work­ing in win­dows — I can script and I can use a con­fig that’s famil­iar, flex­ible and easy to manip­u­late ( ck, if you’d been using CYGWIN OpenSSH, migra­tion to Linux would have been simple :) ). I have also exper­i­mented with run­ning Linux in a VM, which is nice but a bit heavy on resources.

    No doubt I could learn to love the com­mer­cial products if I got more famil­iar with them, but for my pur­poses CYGWIN’s OpenSSH imple­ment­a­tion meets my require­ments just fine. And it’s free :)

  16. Ananth says:

    hello all, i wanted to know if there is a way to con­nect mul­tiple con­soles on TeraTerm. Iam using, teraterm-4.60.Wanted some tool like iTerm its so col­our­ful and so nice​.By the way iam using Winxp professional.

    I down­loaded the TeraTerm Web Pro 3.1.3 from soft­pe­dia, http://​www​.soft​pe​dia​.com/​g​e​t​/​N​e​t​w​o​r​k​-​T​o​o​l​s​/​T​e​l​n​e​t​-​S​S​H​-​C​l​i​e​n​t​s​/​T​e​r​a​-​T​e​r​m​-Web.shtml . The screen shots provided in their site is looks cool, but after down­load­ing i found that it wasnt what they had mentioned.

  17. SullyC says:

    I usu­ally use Terminal on my Mac. I use an open source app called poder­osa, http://​en​.poder​osa​.org for SSH when I need to run it on my PC. Poderosa hasn’t been update since 2006, though​.It does what I need it to. I, too find putty to be clunky.

  18. allen joslin says:

    install Console2 (get the most recent beta!) for a usable replace­ment for the dos win­dow that works with cyg­win to get a reas­on­able replace­ment for iTerm on mac OSX

    Console2: http://​source​forge​.net/​p​r​o​j​e​c​t​s/console/

    Once you’ve installed Console2 edit the set­tings and point your Shell to: C:\\Cygwin.bat and point the star­tup dir to: C:\Documents and Settings\ (which is where you’ll put your .ssh folder.)

    Don’t for­get to go to the mouse sec­tion and turn off ‘shift’ key for select-​​text, go to hotkeys and reset paste to ctrl-​​v, and beha­vior to turn on clear selec­tion on copy and copy unix newlines.

  19. Jon Bright says:

    You might want to try PenguiNet. We’re cheaper than SecureCRT and more user-​​friendly than PuTTY.

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. […] be worth tak­ing some time to under­stand how Java works on your desktop, in the same way that you under­stand how Putty or other favour­ite shell cli­ent works. VN:F [1.0.8_357] Please rate this post :    Why ?Rating: 0.0÷10 (0 votes […]



Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!