2 September 2010

Results of Poll on Using Cisco Second Hand Equipment

Poll ran from 14th December to 4th February and asked “Would you consider using second hand or resale Network Equipment ?”.

So the answer is YES

From a total of 167 Votes, 139 people will consider using second hand equipment, that is, 84% of voters.

2nd-ahnd-poll-results-1.jpg

Which is interesting, because I would not have expected that many people to be in favour of using second hand equipment. I would guess the further examination is needed to determine the level of commitment. For example, would you purchase the Cisco Software Relicensing and then put the equipment back under maintenance ? Would you consider using the second hand equipment in mission critical areas, or only at the edge of your network ?

Let me know if you would like to see a more in-depth poll.

Ideas for the next poll ?

And if anyone has any ideas for the next poll, feel free to contact me or leave a comment below.

Please rate this post:

1 Star - It\\\'s Crud2 Stars - It\\\'s Tosh3 Stars - Something\\\'s missing4 Stars - Needs works5 Stars - Good Enough6 Stars - Good7 Stars - Excellent8 Stars - Brilliant9 Stars - Astonishing10 Stars - Awesomely Godlike? (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

About Greg Ferro
Greg is a Network and Security Architect / Designer / Engineer working freelance in the UK and worked for Resellers, DotCom's, Large Corporate's and Service Providers across a variety of products & Vendors. He prefers to work for end users, believes in the life cycle, total cost of ownership and that near enough is often good enough. He likes talking about himself in the first person to feel "royal", even when hosting the Packet Pushers Podcast on Data Networking. More about Greg at http://etherealmind.com/who-am-i/ and you can follow him on Twitter.

Comments

  1. brettp says:

    Our company uses Network Hardware Resale pretty extensively for our infrastructure. Our primary core is a 6509 chassis with 2 MFSC cards for redundancy, 3 gig blades and 4 10/100 blades. At the time of purchase it would have run us more than $130,000, new. We bought it for $33,000. Not a bad savings for a device that has been running (except for 2 blade failures) for 1787 days, 15 hours, 40 minutes.

    Needless to say, we have new and used gear throughout our infrastructure. A lot of times, for the prices we pay, we normally just take our chances and don’t pick up a maintenance contract and (knock on wood) the hardware is rock solid and just runs. This is why I’m a fan of Cisco gear.

  2. Rob Routt says:

    I agree with Brett. NHR is solid, lower MTBF than new cisco, one-year standard warranty, excellent service and quick turn around. I have yet to have any DOA or problematic orders from NHR.

Speak Your Mind

*