Results of Poll on Using Cisco Second Hand Equipment
February 4, 2009 by Greg Ferro · 2 Comments
Poll ran from 14th December to 4th February and asked “Would you consider using second hand or resale Network Equipment ?”.
So the answer is YES
From a total of 167 Votes, 139 people will consider using second hand equipment, that is, 84% of voters.
Which is interesting, because I would not have expected that many people to be in favour of using second hand equipment. I would guess the further examination is needed to determine the level of commitment. For example, would you purchase the Cisco Software Relicensing and then put the equipment back under maintenance ? Would you consider using the second hand equipment in mission critical areas, or only at the edge of your network ?
Let me know if you would like to see a more in-depth poll.
Ideas for the next poll ?
And if anyone has any ideas for the next poll, feel free to contact me or leave a comment below.
Please rate this post:
Why Rate Posts?
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...Probably Related Posts on the Same Topic
Gray Market Will Give Cisco Blues — GigaOM — My Tips for Second Hand Success.
Gigaom says Cisco second hand market will grow — huh — well of course it will. Here are my tips for doing it.
…
Read the full articleIs EEM Ready for the Big Time ?
Can I use Embedded Event Manager as a tool for High Availability networking ?
Read the full articleOn Layer 2 Access Designs and MPLS
I looking closely at Data Centre Designs at the moment, and been considering whether a looped triangle or a looped square is the best for edge switches. I find it difficult to detect a difference that makes a clear purchasing decision. So I sat down to think about this. I did some pictures and thinking.
…
Cisco: Questions I Have About Cisco, UCS and the Market
I was recently asked to consider Cisco and their UCS and whether it is ready for adoption. This raised a number of questions that I’d like to have answers for.
Read the full article
Our company uses Network Hardware Resale pretty extensively for our infrastructure. Our primary core is a 6509 chassis with 2 MFSC cards for redundancy, 3 gig blades and 4 10⁄100 blades. At the time of purchase it would have run us more than $130,000, new. We bought it for $33,000. Not a bad savings for a device that has been running (except for 2 blade failures) for 1787 days, 15 hours, 40 minutes.
Needless to say, we have new and used gear throughout our infrastructure. A lot of times, for the prices we pay, we normally just take our chances and don’t pick up a maintenance contract and (knock on wood) the hardware is rock solid and just runs. This is why I’m a fan of Cisco gear.
I agree with Brett. NHR is solid, lower MTBF than new cisco, one-year standard warranty, excellent service and quick turn around. I have yet to have any DOA or problematic orders from NHR.