You are here:
Home /
Blog / Network Dictionary — VTP Bomb
Network Dictionary — VTP Bomb
VTP is VLAN Trunking Protocol which propagates VLAN numbers throughout a network. When a switch acting as VTP server with a higher revision number of the VTP database is inserted into the network it can “bomb” the network.
The higher VTP database number will cause VLAN information to be overwritten in all switches. Because the version of the latest database is usually from a switch in the lab which is nothing like the live network, your entire network effectively “dies”.
This is known as a “VTP Bomb”, especially is performed maliciously.
Please rate this post:
Why Rate Posts?

Loading ...
Probably Related Posts on the Same Topic
Slugged — used in relation to IP routing protocols (routing)
Term used to describe that a route has had it metric modified to make it higher cost and therefore not the preferred route to a given destination. Proabably derived from boxing concept of “knocking it out”.
Examples:
“having the route through the network to the VIP’s relevant VLAN slugged.”
“The routing table entry has been slugged by adding a 20 microsecond delay to the routing metrics for EIGRP to the standby context MSFC. This ensures the optimum route is stored in the routing table and the data follows the optimum route to the active context.”
Read the full article
iSCSI — (eye-scuzzee)
- a protocol designed to transport SCSI block data across an IP network thus allowing a single network infrastructure.
- a protocol used by networking teams so they don’t have to understand storage (thanks to Jeff Darcy at Pl.atyp.us)
compare with Fibrechannel
Read the full article
Define Router
Read the full article
Define Legacy
Read the full article
As I’ve said once: VTP = plug-and-play wannabe gone in the wrong direction
http://blog.ioshints.info/2008/12/should-vtp-be-disabled-by-default.html
But it’s fixed in VTP v3 — http://etherealmind.com/vtp-3-making-comeback-review/
Unfortunately, v3 is widely unsupported on smaller switches. GVRP would be the right thing, but for some reason, Cisco has been ignoring this for years…
I’ve seen it mentioned in some 6500 documentation recently, though.
Yeah, it will start there and progressively move into the smaller switches over time (I should think and experience suggests). At a guess, 18 months.