<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network Dictionary &#8211; Mythinformation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-mythinformation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-mythinformation/</link>
	<description>Network design, architecture, thinking, working. Tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Brunello</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-mythinformation/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Brunello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=267#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Just two notes: 
1) Never dealt with OOOOOLD cabling, which still uses 2-pairs patches on PC110 connectors. Well, we had to manually force our gigabit switch to run 100 FD.

2) On the other hand, talking about Cisco equipment, I found old FastEthernet switches were really a mess w/ autosensing; it worked no more than 50% of cases.
BUT, autonegotiation on gigabit-class ones (not only against gigabit hosts, but also down to FastEthernet) was indeed really working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just two notes:<br />
1) Never dealt with OOOOOLD cabling, which still uses 2-pairs patches on PC110 connectors. Well, we had to manually force our gigabit switch to run 100 FD.</p>
<p>2) On the other hand, talking about Cisco equipment, I found old FastEthernet switches were really a mess w/ autosensing; it worked no more than 50% of cases.<br />
BUT, autonegotiation on gigabit-class ones (not only against gigabit hosts, but also down to FastEthernet) was indeed really working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autonegotiation on Ethernet &#8211; it works, it should be mandatory! &#124; My Etherealmind</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-mythinformation/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Autonegotiation on Ethernet &#8211; it works, it should be mandatory! &#124; My Etherealmind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=267#comment-393</guid>
		<description>[...] Let me say it again: This is mythinformation. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let me say it again: This is mythinformation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ferro</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-mythinformation/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=267#comment-392</guid>
		<description>&quot;My experiences arenít mythical; I prefer to think of them as legendary&quot;

Great line, just brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My experiences arenít mythical; I prefer to think of them as legendary&#8221;</p>
<p>Great line, just brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Darcy</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-mythinformation/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Darcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=267#comment-391</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a pattern here: you haven&#039;t *personally* seen something so you dismiss it as a myth.  Well, I&#039;ve seen the things you claim are mythical.  I have several dozen I/O nodes in my lab at work, each of which is a real-life counterexample to your &quot;1GE worth of HBA traffic&quot; claim.  The kicker is that, on an individual basis, each of those nodes is not very expensive or powerful.  This laptop could beat one on most tasks.  Clearly it&#039;s the *non*existence of such things that&#039;s a myth.  The target has *already* moved.

Yes, you have a different experience.  You can stand by your statements all you like, but that doesn&#039;t make them true.  My experiences aren&#039;t mythical; I prefer to think of them as legendary.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a pattern here: you haven&#8217;t *personally* seen something so you dismiss it as a myth.  Well, I&#8217;ve seen the things you claim are mythical.  I have several dozen I/O nodes in my lab at work, each of which is a real-life counterexample to your &#8220;1GE worth of HBA traffic&#8221; claim.  The kicker is that, on an individual basis, each of those nodes is not very expensive or powerful.  This laptop could beat one on most tasks.  Clearly it&#8217;s the *non*existence of such things that&#8217;s a myth.  The target has *already* moved.</p>
<p>Yes, you have a different experience.  You can stand by your statements all you like, but that doesn&#8217;t make them true.  My experiences aren&#8217;t mythical; I prefer to think of them as legendary.  <img src='http://etherealmind.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ferro</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-mythinformation/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=267#comment-390</guid>
		<description>I have a different experience. The only autoneg problems I have seen in the last 3 years where when someone else wasn&#039;t using it, or when the cabling was faulty. Hard setting bypassed the faulty cabling, by in the long term it did cause errors and was replaced. 

And yes, I and others, still believe that. However, it gonna be pretty subjective, your experience may be with high quality servers with good HBA / TOE / setup parameters and that will make the difference, but most people don&#039;t have that setup or that experience so I still stand by my statement. 

I also know that it will not true in the future, but, hey, its a moving target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a different experience. The only autoneg problems I have seen in the last 3 years where when someone else wasn&#8217;t using it, or when the cabling was faulty. Hard setting bypassed the faulty cabling, by in the long term it did cause errors and was replaced. </p>
<p>And yes, I and others, still believe that. However, it gonna be pretty subjective, your experience may be with high quality servers with good HBA / TOE / setup parameters and that will make the difference, but most people don&#8217;t have that setup or that experience so I still stand by my statement. </p>
<p>I also know that it will not true in the future, but, hey, its a moving target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Darcy</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-mythinformation/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Darcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=267#comment-389</guid>
		<description>I think you could have picked a better example.  Autoneg *does* fail on a lot of equipment which is arguably either obsolete or cheap or both, but still quite common even in serious data centers.  I&#039;ve seen it with my own eyes, it&#039;s no myth, and don&#039;t go all No True Scotsman on me by saying anything that fails autoneg is obsolete by definition.  If you want a real myth, how about the one about the &quot;vast majority&quot; of servers not being able to generate 1GE worth of HBA traffic?  That&#039;s apocryphal, false, or old for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you could have picked a better example.  Autoneg *does* fail on a lot of equipment which is arguably either obsolete or cheap or both, but still quite common even in serious data centers.  I&#8217;ve seen it with my own eyes, it&#8217;s no myth, and don&#8217;t go all No True Scotsman on me by saying anything that fails autoneg is obsolete by definition.  If you want a real myth, how about the one about the &#8220;vast majority&#8221; of servers not being able to generate 1GE worth of HBA traffic?  That&#8217;s apocryphal, false, or old for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: etherealmind.com @ 2012-02-11 07:09:00 by W3 Total Cache -->
