<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network Dictionary &#8211; Longhorn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-longhorn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-longhorn/</link>
	<description>Network design, architecture, thinking, working. Tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ferro</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-longhorn/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1107#comment-753</guid>
		<description>Not quite. That would be an example of an IEEEdiot - you beat me by a day, see tomorrow dictionary term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite. That would be an example of an IEEEdiot &#8211; you beat me by a day, see tomorrow dictionary term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-longhorn/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1107#comment-752</guid>
		<description>Sounds like this can also be applicable to a technology standard as well. The promise of a ratified version of 802.11n being just around the corner has meant that old 802.11b kit is still deployed. Apparently a replacement which would have some actual security wouldn&#039;t give enough of a ROI before it needs replacing. *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like this can also be applicable to a technology standard as well. The promise of a ratified version of 802.11n being just around the corner has meant that old 802.11b kit is still deployed. Apparently a replacement which would have some actual security wouldn&#8217;t give enough of a ROI before it needs replacing. *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: etherealmind.com @ 2012-05-23 23:58:09 by W3 Total Cache -->
