2 September 2010

Network Dictionary – Longhorn

Longhorn – noun. To announce a product that isn’t ready for release. In practice, possibly years away. Derived from Microsoft announcing ‘Longhorn’ four or five years before it shipped, thus ensuring that customers did not consider Linux while waiting. Eventually shipped Vista which was a failure.

By longhorning a product announcement, large companies ensure that rivals cannot move into the market space by making customers think that if they just hold on long enough, the next generation of of their current technology will soon be here.

In networking, consider Cisco’s recent ASR9000 announcement with no details on supervisors, line modules, only generic backplane details and limited information on software features. This assists in ‘helping’ customers decision to continue with their 7600 platforms a little bit longer instead of switching to Juniper or other Service Provider edge hardware. A triumph of marketing with a supposed ‘viral social 2.0 campaign’ with engineering hanging their heads in disgust and shame.

Please rate this post:

1 Star - It\\\'s Crud2 Stars - It\\\'s Tosh3 Stars - Something\\\'s missing4 Stars - Needs works5 Stars - Good Enough6 Stars - Good7 Stars - Excellent8 Stars - Brilliant9 Stars - Astonishing10 Stars - Awesomely Godlike? (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

About Greg Ferro
Greg is a Network and Security Architect / Designer / Engineer working freelance in the UK and worked for Resellers, DotCom's, Large Corporate's and Service Providers across a variety of products & Vendors. He prefers to work for end users, believes in the life cycle, total cost of ownership and that near enough is often good enough. He likes talking about himself in the first person to feel "royal", even when hosting the Packet Pushers Podcast on Data Networking. More about Greg at http://etherealmind.com/who-am-i/ and you can follow him on Twitter.

Comments

  1. Michael says:

    Sounds like this can also be applicable to a technology standard as well. The promise of a ratified version of 802.11n being just around the corner has meant that old 802.11b kit is still deployed. Apparently a replacement which would have some actual security wouldn’t give enough of a ROI before it needs replacing. *sigh*

  2. Greg Ferro says:

    Not quite. That would be an example of an IEEEdiot – you beat me by a day, see tomorrow dictionary term.

Speak Your Mind

*