<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iSCSI Network Designs: Part 5 &#8211; iSCSI Multipathing, Host Bus Adapters, High Availability and Redundancy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etherealmind.com/iscsi-network-design-part-5-iscsi-multipathing-hba-ha-high-availability-redundancy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etherealmind.com/iscsi-network-design-part-5-iscsi-multipathing-hba-ha-high-availability-redundancy/</link>
	<description>Network design, architecture, thinking, working. Tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papaiso</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/iscsi-network-design-part-5-iscsi-multipathing-hba-ha-high-availability-redundancy/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Papaiso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 02:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=222#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Excellent article Greg. 
I have a few questions:
you say: &quot;the two network cards must connect to the same Cisco switch&quot;
Is it possible to use other brands rather than Cisco?
If using stackable switches (with 802.3ad support) is it possible to connect each of the 2 NIC to a different switch? 
I am working on a project with a very limited budget (reason why I am using iSCSI rather than FC), can someone please suggest a few budget switches that support LACP and stacking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article Greg. <br />
I have a few questions:<br />
you say: &#8220;the two network cards must connect to the same Cisco switch&#8221;<br />
Is it possible to use other brands rather than Cisco?<br />
If using stackable switches (with 802.3ad support) is it possible to connect each of the 2 NIC to a different switch? <br />
I am working on a project with a very limited budget (reason why I am using iSCSI rather than FC), can someone please suggest a few budget switches that support LACP and stacking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malheiros</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/iscsi-network-design-part-5-iscsi-multipathing-hba-ha-high-availability-redundancy/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Malheiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=222#comment-302</guid>
		<description>&quot;You can configure the Switch LACP AND the Server  LACP (since each can 
only load balance the outbound frames) to use SRC IP / Port and DST IP /
 Port to make the full LACP bandwidth available to a single iSCSI 
initiator / target pair.&quot;

Greg, could you elaborate a bit mopre about this? You mean we can achieve using more than a aphysycal link capacity for a single connection?

Thanks for the excellent article!!!
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You can configure the Switch LACP AND the Server  LACP (since each can<br />
only load balance the outbound frames) to use SRC IP / Port and DST IP /<br />
 Port to make the full LACP bandwidth available to a single iSCSI<br />
initiator / target pair.&#8221;</p>
<p>Greg, could you elaborate a bit mopre about this? You mean we can achieve using more than a aphysycal link capacity for a single connection?</p>
<p>Thanks for the excellent article!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Mossop</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/iscsi-network-design-part-5-iscsi-multipathing-hba-ha-high-availability-redundancy/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Mossop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=222#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Excellent article and interesting reading.

You might be interested to know that HP&#039;s E3500+  series switches support Distributed Trunking otherwise referred to as DT-LACP.

I&#039;ve just recently implemented it in combination with a NetAPP iSCSI based storage system and 2 x E3500 series switches and it appears to work quite well although I&#039;m not completely convinced yet.

Catalyst &amp; StackWise+ anyday of the week + EtherChannel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article and interesting reading.</p>
<p>You might be interested to know that HP&#8217;s E3500+  series switches support Distributed Trunking otherwise referred to as DT-LACP.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just recently implemented it in combination with a NetAPP iSCSI based storage system and 2 x E3500 series switches and it appears to work quite well although I&#8217;m not completely convinced yet.</p>
<p>Catalyst &amp; StackWise+ anyday of the week + EtherChannel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierky</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/iscsi-network-design-part-5-iscsi-multipathing-hba-ha-high-availability-redundancy/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 07:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=222#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Very nice series, Greg! A great and widespreading look inside the iSCSI world!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice series, Greg! A great and widespreading look inside the iSCSI world!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confluence: Sysadmin</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/iscsi-network-design-part-5-iscsi-multipathing-hba-ha-high-availability-redundancy/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Confluence: Sysadmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=222#comment-299</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;iSCSI...&lt;/strong&gt;

{}RFC{}...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>iSCSI&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>{}RFC{}&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Article: The Future of Storage - Seven Fundamental Reasons why FCoE will fail : My Etherealmind</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/iscsi-network-design-part-5-iscsi-multipathing-hba-ha-high-availability-redundancy/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Article: The Future of Storage - Seven Fundamental Reasons why FCoE will fail : My Etherealmind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=222#comment-298</guid>
		<description>[...] iSCSI Network Designs Part 5 - iSCSI Multipathing, HA and HBA  [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iSCSI Network Designs Part 5 &#8211; iSCSI Multipathing, HA and HBA  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: etherealmind.com @ 2012-02-11 16:59:23 by W3 Total Cache -->
