<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Public DNS (and ICMP Internet Test)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etherealmind.com/google-announces-public-dns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etherealmind.com/google-announces-public-dns/</link>
	<description>Network design, architecture, thinking, working. Tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ferro</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/google-announces-public-dns/#comment-1584</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=2291#comment-1584</guid>
		<description>Why not ? Many companies use OpenDNS for the same reason. If you have a small to medium sized company, with two internet connections you need a DNS server that is independent of your ISP. Most ISPs block access to their DNS from outside their network. 

In this case Google&#039;s DNS is much better. It will not recursively look up domain names and present an advertising result which is much nicer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not ? Many companies use OpenDNS for the same reason. If you have a small to medium sized company, with two internet connections you need a DNS server that is independent of your ISP. Most ISPs block access to their DNS from outside their network. </p>
<p>In this case Google&#8217;s DNS is much better. It will not recursively look up domain names and present an advertising result which is much nicer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ferro</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/google-announces-public-dns/#comment-1583</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=2291#comment-1583</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard that L3 are moving away from a public DNS service. They forced a company I worked for to stop using it because of volume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard that L3 are moving away from a public DNS service. They forced a company I worked for to stop using it because of volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RenÈ Jorissen</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/google-announces-public-dns/#comment-1582</link>
		<dc:creator>RenÈ Jorissen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=2291#comment-1582</guid>
		<description>I always used DNS server like 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.3 for simple DNS queries and testing purposes. I guess I will add 8.8.8.8 to that list. 

I cannot imagine a company running the Google DNS servers as their primary DNS forwarders. I am thinking about performance reasons and technical support, so I will just keep using the providers DNS servers and add Google DNS as third or fourth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always used DNS server like 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.3 for simple DNS queries and testing purposes. I guess I will add 8.8.8.8 to that list. </p>
<p>I cannot imagine a company running the Google DNS servers as their primary DNS forwarders. I am thinking about performance reasons and technical support, so I will just keep using the providers DNS servers and add Google DNS as third or fourth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xtsv</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/google-announces-public-dns/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>xtsv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=2291#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>as far as i can see, the performance sucks, l3&#039;s anycasted 4.2.2.2 are better for now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as far as i can see, the performance sucks, l3&#8242;s anycasted 4.2.2.2 are better for now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: etherealmind.com @ 2012-05-23 08:09:55 by W3 Total Cache -->
