<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco: Questions I Have About Cisco, UCS and the Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etherealmind.com/cisco-questioning-ucs-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-questioning-ucs-market/</link>
	<description>Network design, architecture, thinking, working. Tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-questioning-ucs-market/#comment-4591</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/cisco-questioning-ucs-market/#comment-4591</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg - You said on Packetpushers not long ago something about UCS kit being quite innovative. What are the plus points you see with UCS? Is there currently any reason to choose it over existing kit like HP C-Class?
Cheers, Dom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg &#8211; You said on Packetpushers not long ago something about UCS kit being quite innovative. What are the plus points you see with UCS? Is there currently any reason to choose it over existing kit like HP C-Class?<br />
Cheers, Dom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: etherealmind.com @ 2012-05-22 20:19:19 by W3 Total Cache -->
