Thursday, March 18, 2010

Rant:New Logos ? Tasteless Rubbish

August 26, 2008 by Greg Ferro · 11 Comments 


Here are my viewpoint.

Derivative, Flat and just Ugly

The logos provided are the ulti­mate expres­sion of mar­ket­ing dull­ness. Frankly, I can’t find any­thing attract­ive about with of these logos. The only visual impres­sion that I am get­ting is a broken down 1960s Cadillac with chrome fins. Just to be clear, that’s not a good look.

My altern­at­ive vis­ion, is a horse arse with some writ­ing on it.

Compared with these logos, the cur­rent CCIE logo is elit­ist and clas­sic. Perfect. The medal­lion in the logo has lost its con­text because Cisco stopped send­ing out the medal­lion, but it remains a strik­ing visual effect.

BTW, Cisco should start the medal­lion thing again, but we have covered that elsewhere.

Its a logo, not an essay

If this is meant to be a logo, why is there so much text ? I am not get­ting a visual aes­thetic from either of the pro­posed formats, surely, that is what is inten­ded ? Look at this screen­shot of the logos.…

new-ccie-logo-2.jpg

Got any visual impact from that, or did you get tired try­ing to read it ?

Relative Importance

The pro­posed CCIE logos sug­gest that it is the next level. Visually, the CCIE logo looks like ‘just another step’. Which it isn’t, it about ten times more dif­fi­cult and extremely elite. Therefore the logo should be RADICALLY dif­fer­ent from the other logos. Not just some incre­mental pho­toshop tweak­ing on the basic aesthetic.

What I am see­ing here, is some graphic designer told to cre­ate three levels of logo, prob­ably without under­stand­ing the basic premise. Cisco mar­ket­ing prob­ably doesn’t under­stand the dif­fer­ence. So where are the people from the CCIE pro­gram who are sup­posed to be stand­ing up for us ?

Now, I try hard not be an arrog­ant toe-​​rag who is big not­ing him­self, but i think the CCIE pro­gram means some­thing. It is a major achieve­ment, and should be recog­nised as such.

I agree wuth CCIEpursuit — these logos are a BIG improve­ment for CCNP and CCNA pro­grams, but they are dis­par­aging to the CCIE community.

Side by Side — the Old and The New

Put the new the old side by side. Tell me what you think ?

new-ccie-logo-1.jpgCCIE.gifCCIE3035.gif

Postscript

Joe Harris doesn’t think much of the new logos either

Please rate this post:

  Why Rate Posts?
1 Star - It\\\'s Crud2 Stars - It\\\'s Tosh3 Stars - Something\\\'s missing4 Stars - Needs works5 Stars - Good Enough6 Stars - Good7 Stars - Excellent8 Stars - Brilliant9 Stars - Astonishing10 Stars - Awesomely Godlike? (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

11 Responses to “Rant:New Logos ? Tasteless Rubbish”
  1. EDF Network says:

    Could not agree with your more, the old one stands out more. I like your horse a** pic­ture.. pretty funny..

  2. a german CCIE says:

    I don’t really acre which one of these appal­ing logos gets selected…

    I will con­tinue to use the old one! (esp­cially since they do not have a 10-​​year ver­sion anyway)

  3. Same feel­ings here. Lets step it up Cisco. This is sup­posed to be the Premier Network Certification and you want to give me a logo that looks like I won it in a Cracker Jack box. That sucks but at least I have this cool tatoo now!

  4. Joe A says:

    Yep, I totally agree, pretty taste­less. I much prefer the ori­ginal one… I really don’t like the fact that the new logo does not say any­thing about “expert” just some letters

  5. Ethan says:

    Indistinct. Boring. Tedious. Unworthy of what they represent.

  6. the router sym­bol is essen­tial and it shows the mean­ing of the cer­ti­fic­a­tion, again, it does look old and odd, but it has its own beauty, and old is gold,.. again regard­ing the new logos,.. all that glit­ters is not gold. so I’d go for the pretty old Cisco logo. cheers!

  7. CCIETalk.com says:

    Gotta agree. Old logos are the shiz! It has that feel­ing to it. If I ever become a CCIE I will sure use the old logo :)

  8. Mark says:

    I don’t care for the new logos either. The idea of hav­ing a dif­fer­ent logo to sig­nify the dif­fer­ent ver­sions of CCIE isn’t bad though. Maybe they could use the old logo and update the device image in the middle. The one show­ing could be the ori­ginal R&S logo. That way, for multi-​​CCIEs, they could line the logos up across the bot­tom of their busi­ness cards instead of hav­ing one logo and writ­ing Routing and Switching /​ Voice … beside it.

  9. Ahenning says:

    I will be the odd one out and admit I like the new CCIE logo

  10. Dedan says:

    I agree with a ger­man CCIE. I’d use the old one before I’d use any of that garbage. The thing is they say people voted on it but it was a vote about which crap sand­wich you’d rather take a bite out from.

  11. al says:

    Of course, they would change the logo just before I reach the 10-​​year mark! (May need to order that jacket early.….)

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!