Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Rant:New Logos ? Tasteless Rubbish

August 26, 2008 by Greg Ferro · 12 Comments 

When I first heard about the logos, I thought, fair enough. Now I have had a closer look, and taken a few days to think about it — they are rub­bish.
Here are my viewpoint.

Derivative, Flat and just Ugly

The logos provided are the ulti­mate expres­sion of mar­ket­ing dull­ness. Frankly, I can’t find any­thing attract­ive about with of these logos. The only visual impres­sion that I am get­ting is a broken down 1960s Cadillac with chrome fins. Just to be clear, that’s not a good look.

My altern­at­ive vis­ion, is a horse arse with some writ­ing on it.

Compared with these logos, the cur­rent CCIE logo is elit­ist and clas­sic. Perfect. The medal­lion in the logo has lost its con­text because Cisco stopped send­ing out the medal­lion, but it remains a strik­ing visual effect.

BTW, Cisco should start the medal­lion thing again, but we have covered that elsewhere.

Its a logo, not an essay

If this is meant to be a logo, why is there so much text ? I am not get­ting a visual aes­thetic from either of the pro­posed formats, surely, that is what is inten­ded ? Look at this screen­shot of the logos.…

new-ccie-logo-2.jpg

Got any visual impact from that, or did you get tired try­ing to read it ?

Relative Importance

The pro­posed CCIE logos sug­gest that it is the next level. Visually, the CCIE logo looks like ‘just another step’. Which it isn’t, it about ten times more dif­fi­cult and extremely elite. Therefore the logo should be RADICALLY dif­fer­ent from the other logos. Not just some incre­mental pho­toshop tweak­ing on the basic aesthetic.

What I am see­ing here, is some graphic designer told to cre­ate three levels of logo, prob­ably without under­stand­ing the basic premise. Cisco mar­ket­ing prob­ably doesn’t under­stand the dif­fer­ence. So where are the people from the CCIE pro­gram who are sup­posed to be stand­ing up for us ?

Now, I try hard not be an arrog­ant toe-​​rag who is big not­ing him­self, but i think the CCIE pro­gram means some­thing. It is a major achieve­ment, and should be recog­nised as such.

I agree wuth CCIEpursuit — these logos are a BIG improve­ment for CCNP and CCNA pro­grams, but they are dis­par­aging to the CCIE community.

Side by Side — the Old and The New

Put the new the old side by side. Tell me what you think ?

new-ccie-logo-1.jpgCCIE.gifCCIE3035.gif

Postscript

Joe Harris doesn’t think much of the new logos either

Please rate this post:

  Why Rate Posts?
1 Star - It\\\'s Crud2 Stars - It\\\'s Tosh3 Stars - Something\\\'s missing4 Stars - Needs works5 Stars - Good Enough6 Stars - Good7 Stars - Excellent8 Stars - Brilliant9 Stars - Astonishing10 Stars - Awesomely Godlike? (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

12 Responses to “Rant:New Logos ? Tasteless Rubbish”
  1. EDF Network says:

    Could not agree with your more, the old one stands out more. I like your horse a** pic­ture.. pretty funny..

  2. a german CCIE says:

    I don’t really acre which one of these appal­ing logos gets selected…

    I will con­tinue to use the old one! (esp­cially since they do not have a 10-​​year ver­sion anyway)

  3. Same feel­ings here. Lets step it up Cisco. This is sup­posed to be the Premier Network Certification and you want to give me a logo that looks like I won it in a Cracker Jack box. That sucks but at least I have this cool tatoo now!

  4. Joe A says:

    Yep, I totally agree, pretty taste­less. I much prefer the ori­ginal one… I really don’t like the fact that the new logo does not say any­thing about “expert” just some letters

  5. Ethan says:

    Indistinct. Boring. Tedious. Unworthy of what they represent.

  6. the router sym­bol is essen­tial and it shows the mean­ing of the cer­ti­fic­a­tion, again, it does look old and odd, but it has its own beauty, and old is gold,.. again regard­ing the new logos,.. all that glit­ters is not gold. so I’d go for the pretty old Cisco logo. cheers!

  7. CCIETalk.com says:

    Gotta agree. Old logos are the shiz! It has that feel­ing to it. If I ever become a CCIE I will sure use the old logo :)

  8. Mark says:

    I don’t care for the new logos either. The idea of hav­ing a dif­fer­ent logo to sig­nify the dif­fer­ent ver­sions of CCIE isn’t bad though. Maybe they could use the old logo and update the device image in the middle. The one show­ing could be the ori­ginal R&S logo. That way, for multi-​​CCIEs, they could line the logos up across the bot­tom of their busi­ness cards instead of hav­ing one logo and writ­ing Routing and Switching /​ Voice … beside it.

  9. Ahenning says:

    I will be the odd one out and admit I like the new CCIE logo

  10. Dedan says:

    I agree with a ger­man CCIE. I’d use the old one before I’d use any of that garbage. The thing is they say people voted on it but it was a vote about which crap sand­wich you’d rather take a bite out from.

  11. al says:

    Of course, they would change the logo just before I reach the 10-​​year mark! (May need to order that jacket early.….)

  12. arguererB says:

    I found this site using [url=http://google.com]google.com[/url] And i want to thank you for your work. You have done really very good site. Great work, great site! Thank you!

    Sorry for offtopic

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!