<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design: Cisco Firewall Services Module Virtualization Design Traps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etherealmind.com/cisco-fwsm-configuration-design-trap-advice-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-fwsm-configuration-design-trap-advice-help/</link>
	<description>Network design, architecture, thinking, working. Tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etherealmind</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-fwsm-configuration-design-trap-advice-help/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>Etherealmind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1035#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>Personal preference for Juniper firewalls, but yes, would not use service modules for anything because of poor code releases, limited features because of form factor. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personal preference for Juniper firewalls, but yes, would not use service modules for anything because of poor code releases, limited features because of form factor. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-fwsm-configuration-design-trap-advice-help/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 01:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1035#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>This is a 2009 article with the FWSM updates in 2011 has the FWSM improved in anyway or do you still recommend Cisco ASA in a datacenter scenario?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a 2009 article with the FWSM updates in 2011 has the FWSM improved in anyway or do you still recommend Cisco ASA in a datacenter scenario?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ferro</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-fwsm-configuration-design-trap-advice-help/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1035#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t use an FWSM today, they really are crap. Look for the ASA-SM if you must have a module but otherwise I&#039;d recommend an standard ASA firewall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t use an FWSM today, they really are crap. Look for the ASA-SM if you must have a module but otherwise I&#8217;d recommend an standard ASA firewall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Paradiso</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/cisco-fwsm-configuration-design-trap-advice-help/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Paradiso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1035#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. We are looking at using a VRF-lite configuration to hang vlans off a pair of 6513&#039;s and send through the FWSM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. We are looking at using a VRF-lite configuration to hang vlans off a pair of 6513&#8242;s and send through the FWSM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: etherealmind.com @ 2012-05-22 19:51:59 by W3 Total Cache -->
