Sunday, March 14, 2010

Cisco Releases BETA IPSec VPN Client for Windows 7

September 30, 2009 by Greg Ferro · 17 Comments 

Recently Ranted

On a recent rant about being charged for Cisco VPN Client licenses I poin­ted out that the Cisco IPSec VPN cli­ent was end of life.

In the com­ments, someone from Cisco has pos­ted the following:

But on a more import­ant note, not all is lost for the IPSec cli­ent, we have pos­ted a BETA Cisco VPN Client IPSec for Windows 7, Version 5.0.06.0100 can now be got­ten from cisco​.com.

If you have any prob­lems, email cvc-beta(at)cisco(dot)com and let us know.

If you head over to the cisco​.com Security Downloads you can see the following:

Cisco Security Software Download for VPN.(Click for full­s­ize image)

Feedback wanted

And Cisco wants your feed­back at the email cvc-beta(at)cisco(dot)com. I’m not able to do any test­ing right now since I don’t have Windows 7 (and not likely to have any­time soon), so send Cisco the facts, and post your opin­ions here. That would be would be very wel­come to keep me and every­one else up to date.

Please rate this post:

  Why Rate Posts?
1 Star - It\\\'s Crud2 Stars - It\\\'s Tosh3 Stars - Something\\\'s missing4 Stars - Needs works5 Stars - Good Enough6 Stars - Good7 Stars - Excellent8 Stars - Brilliant9 Stars - Astonishing10 Stars - Awesomely Godlike? (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

17 Responses to “Cisco Releases BETA IPSec VPN Client for Windows 7”
  1. Santino Rizzo says:

    From what I can see, still no x64 support.

    • Greg Ferro says:

      To be fair, I don’t think Microsoft is very ser­i­ous about 64-​​bit sup­port. They don’t pro­mote it and a lot of their soft­ware doesn’t run well from what I hear.

      Interesting point though. Will Cisco develop a 64-​​bit IPsec cli­ent ? My guess is no.

  2. andrew says:

    I have been using the same cli­ent I did on vista for some time now.

    • Almir says:

      I don’t have any prob­lem using Cisco VPN cli­ent Ver. 5.0.04.0300 on Windows 7.

      • Tim says:

        Likewise, I’ve been using Ver 5.0.05.0290 on Windows 7 (32-​​bit) without any prob­lems. In fact it seems to per­form a lot bet­ter than the same ver­sion on Vista (32-​​bit).

        However I will try the new beta version.

  3. thinguy says:

    64-​​bit is def­in­itely the future and with Win7 MS is tak­ing it much more ser­i­ous. With 32 and 64bit on on DVD people don’t have to make the choice and be stuck with it.
    I did a check on Best Buy’s site the other day. 52 Windows laptops only 10 were 32bit. I picked up an entry level $500 laptop for my mom and it was even 64-​​bit.

    • Tim says:

      I also agree with “thin­guy” about Microsoft’s stance on 64-​​bit.

      Server 2008 R2 is 64-​​bit only as is Exchange 2007 and 2010 and I expect this trend to con­tinue with other server applications.

      In the cli­ent oper­at­ing sys­tems and soft­ware I’ve seen more and more sup­port for 64-​​bit. A good example is the 64-​​bit device driver sup­port for Media Center in WIndows 7 for things such as TV tuner cards etc.
      Whereas I gave up on XP 64-​​bit, both Vista and Windows 7 64-​​bit have been quite pain­less, espe­cially Windows 7, to the point that most of the time I don’t even think about 32/​64 bit.

      However I do wish Cisco would provide greater sup­port for 64-​​bit and not just for the VPN cli­ent. Cisco Configuration Professional is another product that is not at all 64-​​bit friendly.

  4. Rob Routt says:

    I believe Cisco has done some extreme cost-​​cutting on the SSL vpn solu­tion called AnyConnect essen­tials in lieu of 64-​​bit IPSec cli­ent. The essec­tials will cost $250 list for a 5520 and give you the full com­pli­ment of 750 con­cur­rent ssl users. You do lose the funtion­al­ity of web-​​based ssl vpn and some other fea­tures, but all in all; a great replace­ment for IPSec cli­ent IMO and not near as intrus­ive to the OS.

  5. Missing Digits says:

    Anyone have the beta archived some­where? It is not avail­able for down­load now. Figures.

  6. Missing Digits says:

    Crap, I need a 64 bit cli­ent. I didn’t even notice that this wasn’t regard­ing 64 bit cli­ent. Sucks, I guess any con­nect essen­tials is the only way. WTF, thanks Cisco.

  7. Alex says:

    MESSAGE TO CISCO: If you VPN doesn’t sup­port 64 bit OS’s then we’ll even­tu­ally find on that does. Listen to your pissed off cus­tom­ers. Start devel­op­ing a 64 bit VPN Client.

  8. Paul says:

    Umm, use shrew​.net like every­one else — not everything that works has to have a Cisco logo.…

    • Jason Gurtz says:

      We tried Shrew​.net recently on a Win7-​​x64 el’Cheapo laptop some user picked up at best buy.

      We gave up after the bluescreens started.

      Not say­ing Shrew​.net won’t work for some, but really, we need a sup­por­ted solu­tion here. Unfortunately, we’re stuck recom­mend­ing Virtual PC and an XP x86 image to our users.

  9. Debello says:

    As of yes­ter­day I was able to down­load a new beta ver­sion of the ipsec cli­ent (ver­sion 5.0.07.0240) that is x64 com­pat­ible from cisco​.com. I have the beta run­ning on Windows 7 pro x64 without issues so far.

    • Moath says:

      How did you do that Debello?

      I can’t down­load it from cisco​.com.

      • Debello says:

        Do you have a cisco​.com account and smart­net con­tract? From what I see you must have an account and smart­net in order to down­load the cli­ent from cisco​.com.

    • Kilas says:

      I’ve been using 5.0.07.0240 flaw­lessly … superb in Win7 x64

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!