<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internets of Interest: 28th May</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-28th-may/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-28th-may/</link>
	<description>Network design, architecture, thinking, working. Tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 22:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ferro</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-28th-may/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ferro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 07:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1576#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>It helps if you think of FCoE as connection to your legacy FC infrastructure. Frankly, I think any FC is stupid idea and iSCSI needs to hurry and get finished. 

We have to have viable alternatives to FC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It helps if you think of FCoE as connection to your legacy FC infrastructure. Frankly, I think any FC is stupid idea and iSCSI needs to hurry and get finished. </p>
<p>We have to have viable alternatives to FC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Simmons</title>
		<link>http://etherealmind.com/bookmarks-28th-may/#comment-1059</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherealmind.com/?p=1576#comment-1059</guid>
		<description>Ugh. FCoE is dumb. FC is fine. Ethernet based disk traffic is fine. Why must people merge these technologies into an unholy alliance that suffers from the weaknesses of both?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh. FCoE is dumb. FC is fine. Ethernet based disk traffic is fine. Why must people merge these technologies into an unholy alliance that suffers from the weaknesses of both?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: etherealmind.com @ 2012-05-21 12:16:59 by W3 Total Cache -->
