• Home
  • Who Am I ?
    • Contact
    • What does Ethereal Mind mean ?
  • Disclosure
    • Disclaimer
    • Comment Policy
    • Privacy Policy
  • Just Three
  • Archive

EtherealMind

Software Defined & Intent Based Networking

You are here: Home / Archives for Blog / Outbursts

Outburst: VMware Networking Blog: vSphere 5 New Networking Features – Score D Minus – Must Improv

5th August 2011 By Greg Ferro Filed Under: Blog, Outbursts, VMware

The VMware networking blog talks about the “new” networking features in vSphere 5. Well, talk would be overstating it. Mention, maybe. Post It Note, perhaps.

In fact, you could probably burp out the list on a single beer.

There are two broad types of networking capabilities that are new or enhanced in the VMware vSphere 5 release. The first type improves the network administrator’s ability to monitor and troubleshoot virtual infrastructure traffic by introducing features such as

  • NetFlow V5
  • Port mirror (SPAN)

The following are the key NIOC enhancements:

  • Ability to create User-defined resource pool
  • Support for vSphere replication traffic type
  • Support for IEEE 802.1p tagging

Colour me dubious but a 300% price hike in vSphere licensing for this ? They are definitely taking the mickey. Even with the backdown that delays the price hike to a couple of years in the future (when everyone has forgotten about it), we still don’t have proper networking in VMware.

vSphere Report Card: D-Minus. Shows no sign of improvement in Networking Class.

VMware: VMware Networking Blog: vSphere 5 New Networking Features – Introduction: “”

Rant: Who is Cisco’s Customer ? Me or the reseller ?

28th July 2011 By Greg Ferro Filed Under: Opinion, Outbursts, Rant

I resent the fact that Cisco partners get more information than Customers on Cisco’s website. I think this shows who Cisco thinks the Customer really is. But what special powers do resellers have that makes them more effective ? How does withholding information from Customers give a better outcome ?

My quick thoughts ? Many IT resellers are not competent enough to be business and need a head start to be useful to customers. Without some sort of “special needs” assistance, they wouldn’t be in the race.

Is that too harsh ? IBM and HP don’t rely on resellers to win business and do just fine that way. IBM & HP resellers have to be good enough to survive, not propped up with remedial programs for poor practices. So why does Cisco do it ?

The Reverse Condition

Resellers provide a valuable resource to customers by providing a service that Cisco cannot. For example, resellers offer mixed vendor platform support – say HP servers on Cisco networks, or Windows Desktop support as part of a full spectrum service. A reseller has a unique blend of multidisciplinary skills that give the Customer end to end support.

Cisco wants to work with these partners to provide solutions to customers, in preference to dealing with customers directly.

The EtherealMind View

The word “reseller” tells you a lot about the nature of the business – they buy something and sell it on. Although there are partners who significantly add value to customer networks, my experience is that the vast majority do not. Some thoughts:

  • They don’t make enough profit to invest in engineers or reward staff appropriately. Cisco has screwed reseller margins down to levels that no business can readily support.
  • Resellers tend go out of business every five to ten years because their value is limited and thus are not rewarded with good profits by Customers.
  • Resellers often switch vendors according to where the profits are and abandon customers in the process and thus lose customer loyalty. In the long term, Customers stop trusting the reseller.

If Cisco really believed in the power of the reseller and their own great products and pricing, they wouldn’t have a sales force keeping tabs on what I’m doing. Those phone calls from the Cisco Account Manager to check when the next purchase order is coming shouldn’t be necessary if the reseller industry is working well. The quarterly check-in from the overworked Sales Engineer wouldn’t sound like a “tick in the box” for his quarterly assessment.

I’m a Customer, I want the best possible support and service for my money. I’m pretty sure that for some or even most of us, it’s isn’t by using a reseller.

Where are MY choices ?

Outburst: Oh really ?! Telstra throws AU$800m at clouds – The Register.

17th June 2011 By Greg Ferro Filed Under: Outbursts

In this article on the Register, someone is repeating a press release without giving it too much thought Telstra throws AU$800m at clouds • The Register

Telstra is spending over AU$800 million in cloud computing over the next five years to meet emerging demand in the enterprise space. The carrier claims use of its infrastructure cloud-based services has increased by 50 percent this year, while take-up of voice and video services hosted in the cloud is up 80 percent, delivering more than 100,000 IP telephony services.

So, $800 million you reckon. Thats sounds like rather a lot so I lets look into it. For background, Telstra is the incumbent service provider in Australia with more than 60% of the total marketshare with revenue1 of around AUD$25 billion per year.

  • Lets assume that they allocated $25 million as the project budget in the FIRST year.
  • Lets project 100% growth every year for the next five years ( optimistic, they aren’t getting that growth now – hosted voice and video is growing at 80% per annum after years of market development)
Annual Spend from Initial Project Funding of 25 million
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total 5 Year Spend
Yearly Spend 25 50 100 200 400 775

Oh, wow. Look at that, the power compound interest — a little bit of rounding and you have $800 million over five years from just $25 million up front.

Anyone want to take a bet that 100% growth every year for five years is grossly unlikely ? Do you think that allocating 0.01% of their gross annual revenue to a “cloud” project is big money ? Then consider that their broadband rollout projects is measured in the billions, every year.

Therefore, not such a big cloud project at all. Not even really committed, just pocket money for a big company where some executive has convinced the business it’s the “next big thing”. Compare this with the money spent at Amazon / Google / Facebook for a single data center. Telstra is doing cloud here but it’s just some servers in a few racks of their existing data centers. Big deal.


  1. http://www.telstra.com.au/abouttelstra/investor/financial-information/financial-summary/ ↩

Cisco – Cloud Ready Data Centre Webcast – review

13th April 2011 By Greg Ferro Filed Under: Cisco, Outbursts

As a customer, I watched about the first twenty or so minutes of the Cisco Data Center “Cloud Ready” webcast before it got too uncomfortable to continue. Really, it wasn’t comfortable or interesting viewing at all.

Those senior executives sitting on those chairs looked uncomfortable and not happy with the process. Never quite sure which camera to look at, working from scripted questions, and stilted responses. Using canned phrases as they ‘threw’ control of the conversations back and forth.

Cisco data center launch 1

They were all trying way too hard and I’m thinking they knew that this was going to look like crap. I can’t help but wonder how many hours of time was spent rehearsing and preparing ? How much money spent to build that studio in the background ? How much executive time was lost ?

How much video does Cisco want to produce before they realise they are truly hopeless at it. Valuable resources were pissed away in an attempt to make a media spectacle ? Why ?

It’s time that technology companies learn that you can’t make technology sexy. The CRS-3 didn’t change the internet forever. I record the Packet Pushers Podcast almost every week and I now how hard it is to make it sound good, have good content, stay interesting and have your guests sound natural and fluent.

Buying video companies didn’t make Cisco look cool.

Doing a mega-launch with the “Oprah style” chat format isn’t going to work unless you have professional actors and personalties to anchor the segments. I don’t think we want to see Cisco executives as actors, they should working hard to improve my products, support and slap some sense into Cisco employees.

Just because EMC had an ego marketing event doesn’t mean Cisco has to follow. I believe that the only winner from the EMC event was the career profile of the marketing executives and very little for EMC themselves. In fact, EMC got better marketing from buying the spot on “The greatest TED Talk ever sold: Morgan Spurlock” 1 on TED.com and that only cost USD$8000.

Nice try, but no cigar. 2.


  1. “The greatest TED Talk ever sold: Morgan Spurlock” ?
  2. The origin of the expression, “Close, but no cigar” most likely comes from the early 20th century carnivals when the prize for a game of strength would be a cigar. ?

Use of the term ‘engineers’, IET and Cisco.

26th October 2010 By Greg Ferro Filed Under: Blog, Outbursts

Some twat used the handle ‘P.Eng’ has vomited up a common fallacy on the blog post at Packetlife. He attempts to say that computer people, and networking engineers in particular are not ‘real’ engineers.

In fact, he is wrong. The Institution of Engineers and Technology (IET) does accredit Cisco-certified individuals as recognised engineers.

The Details

logo.gif
The Institution of Engineers and Technology will accredit people with Cisco certification as ‘Chartered Engineers’ and provide professional support assistance and official standing and has done so for some time. People with CCIE certification and suitable experience are recognised as Professional Engineers.

The IET recognises Cisco Career Certifications as an assurance of professionalism and knowledge – http://www.theiet.org/membership/cisco/career-certification.cfm

Here is how the IET enables the recognition and membership:

NewImage.jpg

You can find more details here http://www.cisco.com/global/EMEA/iee-iie/routes.shtml.

Proably the best outline is http://www.theiet.org/membership/cisco/ccc-miet.cfm.

The EtherealMind View

Having been to university for an Engineering degree ( and gave up out of boredom) and through Cisco certification process to CCIE level, they both have their place. The Cisco courses do place a high value on content and knowledge (and, now, so does Juniper and HP ) and require somewhat less rigorous and modern approach, they are no less valid than an engineering degree. At least eighty percent of what I learned was useless and irrelevant (transformer theory, civil engineering principles and motion physics were utterly pointless to an electronics engineer) and the twenty percent I use now is quite valuable.

I think that Network Certifications teach you the twenty percent you need to know and avoid the dross. Education should be about learning what you need and not an endurance test of irrelevance.

So, ‘P.Eng’, feel welcome to leave an apology below in the comments. I’m sure you be pleased to learn the correct use of the term that you seem so passionate about.

Appendix

I was an member of the IET myself for a while, but when I couldn’t renew my membership online I gave up. I couldn’t deal with an organisation that was accrediting my technical ability that didn’t use the Internet.

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next Page »

Network Break Podcast

Network Break is round table podcast on news, views and industry events. Join Ethan, Drew and myself as we talk about what happened this week in networking. In the time it takes to have a coffee.

Packet Pushers Weekly

A podcast on Data Networking where we talk nerdy about technology, recent events, conduct interviews and more. We look at technology, the industry and our daily work lives every week.

Our motto: Too Much Networking Would Never Be Enough!

Find Me on Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Return to top of page

Copyright Greg Ferro 2008-2017 - Thanks for reading my site, it's been good to have you here.

Opinions, Views and Ideas expressed here are my own and do not represent any employer, vendor or sponsor.Full disclosure