11th February 2012

Blinken Lights, It’s All About the Blinking Lights

In a recent post on “How to Build an 100000 port switch” which is a paper from a US University on some nice (but mis-guided) research by students. Ignoring the content of the paper because it isn’t particularly relevant to real life there is a classic line hhedeshian

Lets see… That’s 100,000 ports with 2 LEDs each (link, action/fdx/speed/poe) for a total of 200,000 LEDs. Lets say they use some of the cheapest SMD LEDs on the market. Well use digikey part number 160-1183-1-ND which is a cheap 0603 foot print green LED. At quantity 200,000 that comes out to $12,000 in cut-tape packaging or $9,450 if you buy 210,000 of them in 3,000-qty reels.

Lets say that all of the link LEDs are on 100% of the time and the the activity LED is on 50% of the time. That gives us 150,000 LEDs on at any given point in time. Our example LEDs use 20ma at 2.1V. So 150,000 LEDs at 20ma uses 3Ka. In total, 6.1Kw is burned by the green LEDs.

All that blinking… Damn. I want one NOW!!! More than a girl friend!

Brilliant, awesome piece of geek indirection with facts. All most people can see is the 100000 ethernet ports and Layer 2 broadcast domains. But I’m with hhedeshian, I want to see that many lights!

Postscript

Why do universities insist on publishing in two-column format ? Its a right pain to read on a computer.

This post is copyright of Thropos Ltd ©2008-2011 at Etherealmind.com - contact | email: greg.ferro@packetpushers.net - twitter: @etherealmind | All rights reserved
About Greg Ferro

Greg Ferro is a Network Engineer/Architect, mostly focussed on Data Centre, Security Infrastructure, and recently Virtualization. He has over 20 years in IT, in wide range of employers working as a freelance consultant including Finance, Service Providers and Online Companies. He is CCIE#6920 and has a few ideas about the world, but not enough to really count.

He is a host on the Packet Pushers Podcast, blogger at EtherealMind.com and on Twitter @etherealmind and Google Plus

  • http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog Matt Simmons

    Lesse…if each port is one square inch, that’s 100,000 square inches…according to google, that’s almost 700 square feet. Assuming an 8 ft ceiling, that’s a wall 87.5 feet long of nothing but ethernet ports.

    Cable management is going to be a BITCH

  • Milosh

    With that many LEDs you could probably create some pretty impressive LED art by bringing interfaces up/down =)

  • Brian

    This doesn’t seem all that crazy, considering that they probably are taking the stacking or vss concept to another level. If the switches are distributed, it would just be a logical single switch. Doesn’t seem that novel, just a very large managed switch. On second thought, no spanning tree would be a “good thing”.

    • http://etherealmind.com Greg Ferro

      Not exactly, loop free networks are vital – alternatives to spanning tree are many. I wrote about some of

      them here.